The same speech is not possible for non-state actors, for which a real definition does not exist. In primis, because a well-established definition of State already exists, (the State is a political entity that rules and exercises the power of the sovereign on a given territory and the subjects belonging to it), and secondly for States there is a specific recognition in standard international law. The recognition of a state actor is not a business as complicated as the one of a non-state actor’s. Classifying and recognizing these two subjects of international law, in order to regulate them, is the task being performed directly and indirectly by states, through regulations, international treaties and agreements, in order to define this type of relationship. IHL is the “branch of the law” which regulates and governs the armed conflicts between States and Non-state actors. For this reason, our attention will focus on the definition of Non-State actors.įirst of all, non-states are subjects of International Humanitarian Law. In fact, the aim of this work is to bring the reader deep inside the reasons as to why non state actors have achieved the attention of a relevant part of the academic world, and a position in the international policy. Nowadays, in the overview of International law it is quite interesting to discuss Non State Actors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |